Many bloggers decided to tackle the way ALJAZEERA presents its news. There were so many positive remarks yet there were so many negative ones. One negative point as seen by journalist Batir Wardam for example is that ALJAZEERA talks about corruption of all Arab regimes with the exception of Qatar. He also feels that it deliberately tries to demonstrate political justification of attacks in countries whose relations with Qatar are not so warm particularly Saudi Arabia.
But how do we feel about ALARABIYA from one other perspective? I personally feel that although it was intended to counter attack ALJAZEERA yet it is not as amateur. The news items are described solely from the Saudi perspective and in order to attract more viewers and readers of its website, it attempts to include news items of a sexually explicit nature such as homosexual marriages and lately raping of relatives by Saudi men. Another dangerous point that I feel about this channel is that it attempts to degrade the image of the Palestinian cause and people through the discriminatory selection of comments badly describing Palestinians and branding them as terrorists. I also feel that it attempts to destroy the relations between people in the area.
How do you feel about ALARABIYA? What differences/similarities with ALJAZEERA may be spotted? Would you consider its mission as successful or scandelous?